On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 01:44:01PM +0100, Jonas Hedman wrote: > "How to make oldstyle / classic / traditional / inline PGP work? > > With recent Mutts >= 1.5.7, use the <check-traditional-pgp> function > automatically inside a message-hook, setting this one line in muttrc: > > message-hook '!(~g|~G) ~b"^-----BEGIN\ PGP\ (SIGNED\ )?MESSAGE"' "exec > check-traditional-pgp" > > : Note: This doesn't work so well with inline signatures within MIME > digests. ..."
As the FAQ also notes, setting pgp_auto_decode *does* work with digests, and doesn't require a long regex that's easy enough to botch either the copy-paste or manual typing (especially), so why not just use the option? I'd favor removing the message-hook solution from the FAQ as the other seems clearly preferable (but then, I'm biased). =8^) It's sad to see this question still popping up. Inline PGP is a hack that should have died at least a decade ago, and more like two decades. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
pgpSUdysbCHjF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
