* On 30 Jan 2016, mutt-us...@rcdrun.com wrote: > > to the person who has made the forked mutt? Why bash such person, who is > contributing, on the public list that is going to stay here for ages.
So you've now accused me of jealousy, envy, and "bashing" -- I guess that's defamation? I don't think any of these are accurate. I'm describing why I don't agree with the choices another developer has made, and why I wish he had chosen differently. This grew naturally out of a discussion about differences between mutt-kz and mutt; I didn't just start weighing in ad hoc on another software project, and most of what I've said is in response to you, not the original topic. I've explained my position, so I'll let it lie there. Good luck with your approach of expecting upstream maintainers to independently discover and uptake the worthwhile developments in any forks of their projects. As a developer it seems backwards to me, but if it works for your coding projects, I'm glad for you. -- David Champion • d...@bikeshed.us
