> Since my bindings work without the angle brackets, they appear to be a > documentation peculiarity. I grok their use for containing keyboard > chords, but they don't make much sense for a literal function name.
Well, if I omit the angle brackets my mutt interprets this macro as a series of keystrokes, i.e. it marks the current message (t) and tries to save the senders address (a). At this point I can break the macro. > Looks a bit like a hint that it won't work there? Seems to be. For now I stop investigating on this "problem" since it would be a "nice-to-have" feature. Thank you anyway :) -- Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
