On 2015-09-02 19:50 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > Using 1.5.23, I looked at signed mails on this list. That showed my > theory is wrong : the mail from Brendan Cully announcing 1.5.24 has > the non =-=-= boundary with inline disposition but is good, whereas > that from Kevin J. McCarthy is similar but bad.
FWIW, my mutt (1.5.21) successfully verifies both. I would suspect GnuPG first. -- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court.
