On 11.05.15 12:01, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I am quite familiar with procmail, thank you :) > > But rewriting messages is a no no for me.
May I remind that the poster does not send the [list-tag]? The message is auto-munged in transit by the list server. Eliding the interloper merely restores end-to-end veracity. It is well worth avoiding ending up with the header line: Subject: "[list-tag] Re: [list-tag] Re: [list-tag] Some Guff" after a reply or two. In any event, the "formail -i" archives the incoming subject as the header line "Old-Subject", so it's still there for hysterical raisins, should we fear offending the list admin's feelings. ( -I if you don't care) Mind you, badgering the list admin till the bad practice is stopped can also work, and for my money, it is a good solution. For every other case, I can only share your view. Erik -- My grandmother currently runs ubuntu. This was not my doing, but she managed to wipe her windows and install it accidentally when someone handed her the live CD to deal with a windows problem she was having. The computer asked her to do things. So she did. - Seen on luv-main, in slightly longer form.
