* On 20 Mar 2013, Chris Green wrote: > > Has the mutt handling of this changed in the last few versions?
Not that I know of, and I doubt it. > The python way of doing this is correct according to the RFC as far as I > can tell, there *should* be a blank line between the end of a message > and the 'From ' starting the next message. Thus the python library I'm > using does add this blank line. > > However mutt detects this as an error and outputs the messsage about the > mailbox being modified. There absolutely should be a blank line. I think though that the order is wrong: mutt expects that a message (i.e. a From_ line) appears at the old EOF marker, and that the EOF marker is on/after a blank line. I think that if you adjust your filter to write the message and then a blank line instead of a blank line and then a message, the error will go away. -- David Champion • d...@bikeshed.us
