Hi Patrick, On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:45:59PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Chris Green <c...@isbd.net> [12-22-12 12:14]: > > Yes, I know I have hijacked 'n', I might change it but that doesn't > > affect the argument about whether using next-unread-mailbox is better > > than change-folder for seeing new mail. > > It is apparently not in *your* use case, but I have been using mutt since > ~1998 and do *not* have a problem finding new mail. Perhaps you should > re-examine your usage/habits, instead of branding the evolved default > settings of mutt as illogical and unusable and instead try to determine > *why* they are the way that they are.
if you do know where this exactly comes from please tell me. I am still no getting why it is behaving the way it is - from my point of view I think the browser-view should be usable with the limit functionality. Can you tell me what way to find new mail you use? I resorted to having three calls for the mailboxes-command, one with all mailboxes, one with "only mailboxes with unread mail" and one with IMAP only (some misc accounts, not my main one).. Thanks and kind regards, Andre -- Andre Klärner
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
