On 2012–12–20 Patrick Shanahan wrote:

> You access the mail box and leave, then expect mutt to still show
> new mail.

Yes, I do. If there is a new unread message in the mail box and I
enter and leave it is still contains an unread message that resides
in the .mailbox/new directory. I'm sorry that I still don't get it.
To quote the help:

  “The (by default unbound) function <next-unread-mailbox> in the index
  can be used to immediately open the next folder with unread mail (if
  any)”

and

  ├────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────┤
  │<next-unread-mailbox>   │open next mailbox with new mail  │
  ├────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────┤

I have a mailbox with unread mail in it (I did not read the mail,
right?) and this mail is new (it shows an “N” in the index) and
pressing “.” shows that this mailbox contains new mail (so mutt
thinks I have a new mail in this mailbox). As far as I understand
the help text I quoted, mutt should open this very mailbox if I
invoke “next-unread-mailbox”.

> > Since there is a file in the mailbox “new” directory (.beta/new)
> > mutt should be able to tell that there's new mail regardless of the
> > modification time. Even if mutt uses the modification time, why do
> > the commands “buffy-list” and “next-unread-mailbox” don't share the
> > same opinion if I have any new mail?
> 
> not "how it works!".

Apparently I don't understand what the function
“next-unread-mailbox” is supposed to do.

Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to