On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 06:00:14PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:55:38PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> I've worked some hours the last days to find fonts in my system
> which work for the pager. I've put the result in .Xdefaults:

Great to hear.  I'll be honest, I don't understand why it worked with
your old font in some programs, and not in Mutt.  But I guess as long
as it works, there's nothing else to do. ;)

> ! The following fonts do not work with mutt's builtin pager,
> ! but they do work for w3m, less, joe and emacs:
> !
> !XTerm*font:  -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--14-130-75-75-c-70-iso10646-1
> !XTerm*font:  -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-140-75-75-c-90-iso10646-1

That seems bizarre to me.

>  > If you do try it, I use that in my xterms with the following resource
>  > setting:
>  > 
>  >   XTerm*font: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-13-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-*
> 
> Where have you got this one from ?

It's the same as the one you posted:

 -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso10646-1

The only difference is mine has wild cards.  It's the only font that I
have installed that matches though, so the wild cards don't really
change anything.

> libncursesw.so.8 versus libncurses.so.8 ! Could that make the difference ?
> Is +HAVE_CURS_SET or +HAVE_WC_FUNCS responsible here ?

That seems like it should be unlikely, but it's possible.  They should
be the same library, except the 'w' version has wide character
support.  Normally you need the wide character support for mutt to
work correctly with Unicode, and I would expect the same to be true
with the other programs as well.  It's possible that the lib is buggy
though...  Programs using the non-w version might work by virtue of
the fact that they're just dumping the raw bytes to your terminal,
which is interpreting the UTF-8 sequences correctly.

> Okay, basically the problem is solved. And I like the GNU Unifont.

Me too. :)

> Thank you very much, Derek, for your great help.

Glad to have helped, though I'm not really sure what I did. :)


-- 
Derek D. Martin    http://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail due to spam prevention.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

Attachment: pgp3ibJ1BIR5J.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to