On 19.11.11 12:51, Chris Green wrote: > I've never *really* fathomed out why mutt has both a lists and a > subscribe command. Does anyone ever not have exactly the same list > fed into both commands?
I've used mutt for many years, without any "subscribe" in .muttrc. The only difference I found in a quick manual scan just now, is: » Additionally, when you send a message to a subscribed list, Mutt will add a Mail-Followup-To header to tell other users' mail user agents not to send copies of replies to your personal address. « Since other MUAs don't always think exactly like mutt, I've found it desirable to intercept "courtesy" copies in procmail. Erik -- You may call me a pedascule, but I for one do not choose to palter with the language and will not blench from using the best word even if my portance is occasionally a fardel to my readers. - http://blogs.abc.net.au/newseditors/2010/09/should-words-die-so-that-language-might-live.html
