On Monday 10/24/11 16:45:22 CST, Michael Graham wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 05:06, du yang wrote: > > > Yes, I can try to workaround the problem as Stardiviner suggests. But to > > make mutt more error-tolerant I think mutt still has something to be > > improved. > > I agree that mutt could do a better job of handling it, but all the MUAs I’ve > ever used extensively (Thunderbird, Lotus Notes, Outlook, Apple Mail) have > had a similar problem of choking up once mailboxes reach the high thousands. > I’m not going to delve into the philosophy of whether sorting that much mail > is a job for mutt or for another, specialised mail filing/sorting application.
Mutt has been brilliant enough. I might demand too much ;) > You should file a bug report/feature request, and in the meantime, > you’ll probably have to fall back on Stardiviner’s workaround until it gets > fixed. I have made it work with Stardiviner's workaround. Also a bug report has been registered. -- oooO::::::::: (..)::::::::: :\.(:::Oooo:: ::\_)::(..):: :::::::)./::: ::::::(_/::::
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
