Sorry :)

As I see, I was quite stupid, unfortunately.

My email should be encrypted not with my public key, of course, but
with public keys received from addressees. That's why I was suggested
to select keys (question No. 1) , and that's why I gpg has told me
that the key was already present (there should be two different public
keys) (question No. 2).

Am I right? If so -- then, please, forgive me for disturbing you :).


Sincerely yours,


-- 
dsjkvf



On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 13:15, dsjkvf <dsj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
>
> I would be grateful if someone could confirm if I've done everything right:
>
> a). I'm using Mutt 1.5.18 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 with gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9
> b). Here is a fragment from my .muttrc:
> ---
> set pgp_decode_command="/opt/local/bin/gpg   %?p?--passphrase-fd 0?
> --no-verbose --quiet  --batch  --output - %f"
> set pgp_verify_command="/opt/local/bin/gpg   --no-verbose --quiet
> --batch  --output - --verify %s %f"
> set pgp_decrypt_command="/opt/local/bin/gpg   --passphrase-fd 0
> --no-verbose --quiet  --batch  --output - %f"
> set pgp_sign_command="/opt/local/bin/gpg    --no-verbose --batch
> --quiet   --output - --passphrase-fd 0 --armor --detach-sign
> --textmode %?a?-u %a? %f"
> set pgp_clearsign_command="/opt/local/bin/gpg   --no-verbose --batch
> --quiet   --output - --passphrase-fd 0 --armor --textmode --clearsign
> %?a?-u %a? %f"
> set pgp_encrypt_only_command="pgpewrap /opt/local/bin/gpg    --batch
> --quiet  --no-verbose --output - --encrypt --textmode --armor
> --always-trust -- -r %r -- %f"
> set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="pgpewrap /opt/local/bin/gpg
> --passphrase-fd 0  --batch --quiet  --no-verbose  --textmode --output
> - --encrypt --sign %?a?-u %a? --armor --always-trust -- -r %r -- %f"
> set pgp_import_command="/opt/local/bin/gpg  --no-verbose --import -v %f"
> set pgp_export_command="/opt/local/bin/gpg   --no-verbose --export --armor %r"
> set pgp_verify_key_command="/opt/local/bin/gpg   --verbose --batch
> --fingerprint --check-sigs %r"
> set pgp_list_pubring_command="/opt/local/bin/gpg   --no-verbose
> --batch --quiet   --with-colons --list-keys %r"
> set pgp_list_secring_command="/opt/local/bin/gpg   --no-verbose
> --batch --quiet   --with-colons --list-secret-keys %r"
> set pgp_autosign = yes
> set pgp_autoencrypt = yes
> set pgp_sign_as=0xEC0E4D22    # This is my the only one public key,
> which is paired with my the only one private key
> set pgp_show_unusable = no
> <...>
> my_hdr Cc: <my-ot...@adress>    # I email a copy of every letter to my
> other address
> ---
> c). Now, I compose an email To: s...@address (and Cc: my-ot...@address
> is automatically added). I see in the letter's window that 'PGP' is
> set to 'Sign, Encrypt (PGP/MIME)' and 'sign as' is set to '0xEC0E4D22'
> -- so, everything looks nice, exactly according to the .muttrc.
> d). Then I press 'y', and Mutt asks me to 'Enter keyID for
> s...@address: '. And here goes question No. 1: Why? I have the only
> one key, which is listed in .muttrc, so, shouldn't Mutt just take it
> automatically?
> e). However, I press Enter, Mutt shows me my pubic key, I do select it
> by pressing Enter again (and, actually, I have no other choice), and
> then the history repeats, and Mutt asks me for the key for
> 'my-ot...@address' (which is listed in Cc:).
> 6. So, I do press Enter-Enter once again, Mutt asks me for PGP
> passphrase, I enter it, and then gpg says 'gpg: 0xEC0E4D22: skipped:
> public key already present', and that is my question No. 2: what does
> this phrase mean, why does it appear, and how can I avoid it?
> 7. After it my email flies encrypted to both addresses, so, there
> seems to be no error, but just to many additional keypresses :). And I
> would be very grateful if you could help me avoid [some of] them :).
>
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
>
> --
> dsjkvf
>

Reply via email to