On 20100411_200302, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 04:59:19PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> >On 20100409_103212, Michael Elkins wrote:
> >>It was unclear from your message exactly where the problem lies.  Are
> >>you seeing the address list truncated in the compose menu?  I do see
> >>that Mutt truncates the *display* of the address list at 255 chars, but
> >
> >I have a 1280x1080 flat screen, and to discover the problem I ran a xterm
> >with font size 6. It was a test, not my normal way of reading mail.
> 
> FYI, I increased the maximum size of the buffer used to display
> address lists to 1024.  Hopefully you don't have a terminal wider
> than that. ;-)
> 
> me

Thanks, but ---

I think I prefer "set edit_headers=yes". Before your earlier email I
had been unaware of this option. It allows me to review the whole
email at once, prior to sending. It doesn't bother me at all that I
can't edit some of the headers that I see.

If I discover a header that I really, really don't like, I know that I
can abort sending the email.

If I notice a header that I don't understand why it is there, I can 
investigate. 

In general, I feel I am better off with this than I would be if I were
using what I asked for.

-- 
Paul E Condon           
pecon...@mesanetworks.net

Reply via email to