On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 11:13:38PM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> While cc to a gentleman in another forum. I got a private mail:
[...]
> This all look strange.  Did mutt encode the To: field correctly?

At a glance, it looks right to me, but it's been a while since I
looked at the relevant RFC.  I'd re-post this on mutt-dev... some
folks that hang out there are more familiar with this, and it's really
a better place to ask "is mutt doing the wrong thing" kinds of
questions...

-- 
Derek D. Martin    http://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail due to spam prevention.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

Attachment: pgpxYfbMBb3iO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to