On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:16:57PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > But anyway, I don't consider this message to have ANY "attachments". > The person didn't send me any extra files to look at. They sent me the > same message twice, one with extra formatting and one without. I don't > think most people would consider that to be a message with > "attachments", so I don't think mutt should say that there is an > attachment.
Well, I would consider such a message as attachment only: No message (i. e. no body), only three attachments.
