On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:18:40PM +0100, Peter Münster wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19 2008, Chris G wrote: > > > Well something funny is going on, the mail *should* be seen as new > > shouldn't it? :- > > > > chris$ ls -lc --full-time > > total 16 > > -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris 4818 2008-12-19 13:04:01.000000000 +0000 > > freewant > > -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris 7234 2008-12-19 13:04:50.000000000 +0000 ixion > > chris$ ls -lu --full-time > > total 20 > > -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris 4818 2008-12-19 13:04:01.000000000 +0000 > > freewant > > -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris 7234 2008-12-19 13:04:50.000000000 +0000 ixion > > Hello Chris, > > I don't think so. It should be seen as new, if access time is earlier than > modification time, but in your case it's the same time. > ... but that's what new mail looks like when the mailboxes previously weren't there. Are you saying that mutt will only see new mail if the file existed beforehand?
-- Chris Green
