Seems fine. Does anyone object?
On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 01:59, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:
> * Mon Nov 17 2008 Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > What does mutt-dev think about making $reverse_alias apply to replies?
>
> It looks easy.
> I don't set $reverse_alias though.
>
> diff -r 8199185fa595 send.c
> +++ b/send.c Tue Nov 18 01:53:21 2008 +0900
> @@ -192,11 +192,23 @@
> char buf[HUGE_STRING];
> char *err = NULL;
> int idna_ok = 0;
> + ADDRESS *rev, *i;
>
> do
> {
> buf[0] = 0;
> mutt_addrlist_to_local (*a);
> + if (option (OPTREVALIAS))
> + {
> + for (i = *a; i; i = i->next)
> + {
> + if ((rev = alias_reverse_lookup (i)) && rev->personal)
> + {
> + FREE (&i->personal);
> + i->personal = safe_strdup (rev->personal);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> rfc822_write_address (buf, sizeof (buf), *a, 0);
> if (mutt_get_field (field, buf, sizeof (buf), M_ALIAS) != 0)
> return (-1);
