On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:43:17PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote:
> On Friday, April 4, 2008 at 10:53:02 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
[...]
> Something like a $display_filter acting on index but not on replies
> would surely be good, but it doesn't exist yet.
Aside: back in 2006 I implemented something like this for 1.5.12 by
incorporating a Lua interpreter into mutt. When displaying a subject
line, mutt would convert the message's ENVELOPE data into a Lua table,
call a Lua function "get_printable_subject", and then use whatever
string came back as the displayed subject line. The actual message
file/data was never modified, so when replying it would still use the
original subject line.
> > [MDA] removes those annoying "[<list name>]" insertions in the subject
> > lines
Ironically my goal was to _add_ those [list] tags to the lists that
didn't already have them. I normally use a single inbox for all mail
and I wanted my lists consistently marked. The Lua code looked
something like this:
function is_to(envelope,addr)
return envelope.to ~= nil and envelope.to[1].mailbox == addr
end
function is_xubuntu_message(envelope)
return is_to(envelope,'[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
end
function get_printable_subject(envelope)
local subject = envelope.subject
if subject == nil then subject = '' end
if is_xubuntu_message(envelope) then
subject = '[xubuntu] ' .. subject
end
...many more cases...
return subject
end
It could certainly have done the opposite -- searching for and cutting
out the [list] tags instead.
I also had mutt call a "get_matchable_subject" Lua function when
matching a subject line. My Lua code defined get_matchable_subject()
to be the same as get_printable_subject(), so searches and limit
operations were able to see the fake [list] tags as well.
Eventually I reinstalled the OS and started using the newer mutt
supplied by the distribution vendor (without my Lua hooks). I've been
meaning to rebase the patches on a more recent mutt but just haven't
gotten around to it yet.
-Dave Dodge
