On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 05:25:30PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > * Christoph Ludwig [07-10-25 12:26:04 +0200] wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:08:52PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > >>Is there at least anyone but me who uses gpgme instead of classic method > >>with this error-prone commandline config? ;) > > Mutt comes with pgp and gpg samples that simply work out of the box... > :) > > >actually, you configure it in the gnupg config files rather than .muttrc > >(don't ask me why). Add to gpgsm.conf a line > > > encrypt-to 0x................ > > >whith the dots replaced by the fingerprint of your key. > > Well, this is one way. The other is to change the sample config for > gnupg to include -R <yourid> so that you have it on a per-application > basis. > > With mutt, of course you even change these settings as usual via hooks > to include -R or not (using handy $my_ variables this is easy).
which configuration samples do you refer to? The one I found is in contrib/gpg.rc. If I am not mistaken, then this sample shows how to configure the classic gpg backend. However, the OP explicitly asked for a solution using the gpgme backend. Regards Christoph -- FH Worms - University of Applied Sciences Fachbereich Informatik / Telekommunikation Erenburgerstr. 19, 67549 Worms, Germany
