Hello Kai,
On Monday, August 27, 2007 at 11:37:34 +0200, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
> Try "utf-8:iso-8859-1" instead of "iso-8859-1:utf-8". For practical
> purposes, no L1 strings decode as UTF-8, imho.
Sure right, auto-sensing "utf-8:iso-8859-1" already works very well
(for raw headers) with today's validity check. This order would not
benefit at all from a validity + printability check. I was trying to
evaluate the potential benefit of such advanced check in terms of
interesting new pairs or new orders becoming (or not) workable.
Bye! Alain.
--
Mutt muttrc tip to send mails in best adapted first necessary and sufficient
charset (version for Western Latin-1/Latin-9/CP-850/CP-1252 terminal users):
set send_charset="us-ascii:iso-8859-1:iso-8859-15:windows-1252:utf-8"
