Derek Martin wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:10:35PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Wow. I mean, wow.
You're missing another alternative. Just don't post.
Oh, as to the nature of your comments...
Perhaps you mean to suggest that you think I'm arrogant. Well, if so,
that's true, I am arrogant. But I'm also right. My methods minimize
the time spent reviewing unwanted mail, while also GUARANTEEING ZERO
LOST MAIL WITH 100% CERTAINTY. No other anti-spam methodology can do
the latter while still doing the former. That makes mine technically
superior. Period. To me, not loosing mail is more important than
minimizing spam, but fortunately I can do both.
I may be arrogant, but I'm also very good at what I do; and my
participation on this list and others has helped a lot of people over
the years (though perhaps less so recently, as I become more jaded and
bitter as I age)...
I have lived long enough to learn to never say never and only God is
right and He only has a real guarantee with 100% certainty. No offense
meant, and I hope this doesn't offend you.
I don't like spam, but there is nothing I can do about my ISP server's
spam filter and your system is apparently not used there and at other
places I send e-mail to.
--
Phil Sexton: http://www.myspace.com/philsexton
Praise Whistlers Abroad: http://praisewhistlers.org/
Naomi's Fancy: http://www.naomisfancy.net/
Naomi's Fancy myspace: http://www.myspace.com/naomisfancy/
Naomi's Fancy CDs: http://www.cdbaby.com/naomisfancy/
Naomi's Fancy Free tunes:
http://www.naomisfancy.net/modules.php?name=Downloads
