On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:01:20PM -0700, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Tuesday, February 27 at 10:53 AM, quoth William Yardley:
> > but I don't think it's been maintained. > > I'm speaking out of ignorance here, but why would you need a patch for > this? (Unless maybe it's making mutt use the new filename semantics?) > I used to do the mutt+Courier thing, and it was pretty easy, I just > had to get into the habit of hitting "=." in front of my folder names > rather than just "=". Yeah - it was just a cosmetic patch. I didn't actually try it myself, since I also wasn't really bugged by doing it as you describe; but it's not really that neat. I think it makes more sense for folders to show up as =foo/bar rather than =.foo.bar or whatever (of course you'd still be able to access the actual mailbox path by not prefixing with = or +). w
