* David Ellement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-24 23:21]: > > then again, you did not describe the purpose of this idea > > so i'm just wasting my time with guesses again. > I suppose it is silly... > > I typically have a couple of projects going where I'm part of a small > team here, working with another small team at another company. > > For each project, I have one engineer at the other company > that is my principal contact; we have a list setup that > includes all the members of both teams (and we usually have an > internal list that includes just our company team members). > > The normal etiquette is to address messages > directly to my contact, and copy the list.
as i understand it, the situation is something like this: "our team": A1 B1 C1 "their team": A2 B2 C2 "me": A1 "my contact": B1 "list": A1 B1 C1 A2 B2 C2 =: L and your mails to them would look like this: From: A1 To: B1, L so why not define an alias for "B1, L" then? alias project [EMAIL PROTECTED], listaddress and i do not see a need to put these addresses onto separate lines. > Most of us handle related messages the same way: we dump messages > addressed to us into our inbox (which we'll check often) and messages > to the list into a list box (which we check once or twice a day). > I could accomplish the same thing by just addressing the list, > but it interferes with the sorting the urgent (to me) messages > from the informational (to someone else on the team) messages. i understand that the urgent messages will be from your contact person, so you could simply copy messages "From: B1" to your inbox, too: :0 c * From:.*B1 * TOlistaddress LIST > Having my editor add the CC line is a reasonable solution. an alias is much cleaner. ymmv. Sven