* Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-01 13:43]: > Default: depends on the compile-time configuration, e.g. "/path/file" > (check with "mutt -v | grep keyword") > > It must be clear that "/path/file" is only an example. > There is no reason why the administrator would have > used "standard" options to configure. So, the user > mustn't assume anything without checking with mutt -v.
you will have to write a *lot* to clear this up for every option... * Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-01 13:45]: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 07:41:22 -0500, Patrick wrote: > > That IS THE INFORMATION presented in the INSTALL > > file within the tarball/rpm issue for each > > version of mutt and most other program issues. > > The user doesn't necessarily have the tarball or rpm. > Moreover, the INSTALL file doesn't say anything about > the options used for the installed Mutt binary. is this really from you, too, Vincent? i double-checked on this after i read it. just as the INSTALL file cannot give info about the installed mutt binary - the manual cannot do this, either. the goal, however, is clear: better documentation and the version info of mutt needs to give more info, too. i hope we still agree on these things. PS: send-hook ~l 'set signature=""' Sven [who avoids signatures on mailinglists - and only adds them when they contain further info]
