On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 08:05:01PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> * Peter T. Abplanalp [02-07-24 19:55:29 +0200] wrote:
> 
> > for example (untested):
> 
> > set pgp_decrypt_command="gpg --passphrase-fd 0 --no-verbose --batch
> > --output - %f | sed 's/^M//'"
> 
> (sed 's/
$//' is much better)

you are, of course, correct.

> Hmm, what happens with signed and encrypted mail? If GnuPG
> does decryption and verification at once it may be
> sucessfull, if not then not. IMHO the more better solution
> is (untested):
> 
>   set display_filter="sed s/
$//"
> 
> This will only manipulate what you see and not the body. If
> your example was used I guess you'll run into trouble when
> formarding mail (or do something else with it).

heck, i don't know.  it all depends on why he wants to remove the
^M's.

-- 
Peter Abplanalp

Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP:     pgp.mit.edu

Attachment: msg29849/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to