Michael Elkins sez: [...] } I believe the following approach is a good compromise. This patch adds } a reply-hook command which is just like the send-hook, except that it } matches against the message you are replying to rather than the message } you are sending. All reply-hook's are execute prior to send-hook's. } However, you can inhibit send-hook's in the reply case by using the } pattern '! ~Q' (not-replied) in the send-hook to tell when reply-hook's } have been executed. [...]
I love it! How soon and how likely is that to get into the official source? I'd love to be able to tell my sysadmin to install the latest version and have that functionality. --Greg
