On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 03:39:16PM +0100, Lee J. Moore wrote: | On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: | | [..] | > http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/postfix/vsqmail.html | | Postfix certainly seems to blow the others away.
It does seem that way.
| > FWIW I like exim the best and postfix next. I've heard too many
| > horror stories about sendmail, and read too much of djb's attitude.
| > (also exim has some capabilities that postfix doesn't)
|
| My ISP uses Exim and I rather like the level of control they've
| given me for bouncing messages, forwarding mail, using
| SpamAssassin, etc. Doing this at the ISP level saves wasting my
| own bandwidth and CPU cycles. I wonder how well Exim performs
| when compared to Postfix. I'm searching for benchmarking info
| again now. ;)
Reread the above URL. It compares postfix, exim, qmail, and sendmail.
It seems to indicate that exim is in second place. However, that
benchmark is now outdated since exim is at version 4.05 (it used
3.33).
| Thanks for that URL btw. :)
You're welcome. I got it from the postfix-users list.
-D
--
Reckless words pierce like a sword,
but the tongue of the wise brings healing.
Proverbs 12:18
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/
msg29615/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
