On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 12:35:41PM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:59:40AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> > % I'm trying to get a new message flag to display in front of my
> > % folder name in the folder index view. So I'm doing the following:
> > %
> > % set folder_format="%2C %N %8s %d %f"
> >
> > % I'm seeing:
> > %
> > % 10 66442 May 13 08:48 apache_users
> >
> > Hmmm... That says to me that your access-time timestamp has been updated
> > by something looking at the folder, be it biff or wnewmail or your shell
> > or even mutt.
>
> How about trying a simple test to isolate where the problem is (i.e.
> is it a "set folder_format" problem, or is some other process messing
> with the timestamp):
>
> What happens if you remove the "set folder_format" from your .muttrc
> and then restart mutt? Will that make the "N" flag show up correctly?
Good thought, but that doesn't seem to be the problem. Upon remove my
folder_format line I see the listing as so:
10 -rw------- 1 arrison arrison 112989 May 13 12:34 \
apache_users
And my mod date is still more recent than my access date.
-Mike
