Rahul -- ...and then Rahul Rekapalli said... % % Hi,
Hello! % I enabled PGP signing in mutt, when i view the mail, mutt shows the % PGP signature inline, but a couple of friends of mine who use Pine, Of course. mutt sucks less than anything else! % asked me why my PGP signature was attached rather than being inline. That's because they use Pine instead of The One True MUA. % Is there something that I have configured wrong? Please advise. You've just stepped into a war zone :-) I'll respond that your mutt is configured correctly and, additionally, that you're doing it Right and your friends are doing it Wrong, and I'm sure there will be someone to come along and say exactly the opposite. You can find much more info on the PGP/MIME vs pgp_create_traditional debate in the mailing list archives if you want to learn about the matter. In short, if you want to stick with the standard, handle charsets other than ASCII, and/or manage attachments under PGP, then don't change a thing and enjoy PGP/MIME, but if you don't mind the limitations inherent in switching, you could set pgp_create_traditional and send your messages with the old "in-line" signing as still required by some mail user agents. % % Rgds % Rahul HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27538/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
