* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-05 14:46]: > * Will Yardley [04/05/02 20:55:36] wrote: > > this is very useful for getting help online and so on, since it's > > generally much more compact than the actual postfix configuration > > file. > > Exactly. And because mutt allows inclusion of other files, some script > here and some script there, it would be helpfull to have a dump of > what mutt will really use. And which of those values are not default.
Vim has a "scriptnames" command, which "[l]ist[s] all sourced script names, in the order they were first sourced." I find it to be *very* useful, and something similar should be considered for inclusion if a variable dump is added to mutt. (darren) -- Blore's Razor: Given a choice between two theories, take the one which is funnier.