Byrial, et al -- ...and then Byrial Jensen said... % % On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 08:09:07 -0500, David T-G wrote: % > % > Well, I think I have pinned my memory leak problems down to Byrial's ... % > Byrial, do you hvae any ideas? Please drop me a note if you get this; I % > haven't heard from you in a while. % % Ups! When I first made the patch, nobody called hash_destroy()
Heh. % with a destroy-function as a argument, so I uncommented the part % of the code to handle this. But now the new threading actually % uses this. Ah, I get it. % % Anybody who uses the current hash_destroy patch, should also use % the following patch to remove the outcommenting. I will update the % patch at my website tomorrow. I'll wait for that before I rebuild, then. Byrial, did you ever get my other note regarding your my_hdr_subject patch and my problems? Thanks! :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg26753/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
