David T-G wrote: > > > > Can I convince mutt to ignore the In-Reply-To header if there > > > > is a References header? ... > > > > I guess he could use procmail to remove the In-Reply-To header if > > there is a References header. Or rewrite it to say the same > > thing. > > See the original mail; he already begged to not go that route > because of all of his old mail that would need reprocessing.
Reprocessing isn't hard: formail -s procmail ... Steve
