* Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [22-01-2002 12:28]: > René Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 22/01/2002 (12:26) : > > > > Apart from the useful links, you're missing the point. Cameron was > > saying that the amount of time spent trimming is _outweighed_ by the > > time saved. That means that he means that one _should_ trim! > > This is not correct at all. It is just lazyness as you also > demonstrated. It took me max 2 seconds to trim this mail.
You're overdoing it. You're *way* overdoing it. Get back to my mail. If I just quoted you, it would start with "Bullshit". I think it would be convenient for the readers to read *in context* (that means, in the same mail) what you think is bullshit. Same reason why I leave my text quoted in this mail. You're "this" is a direct reference, which IMHO *must* be included. Before I write a reply, I _do_ trim. And it usually takes me over 2 seconds. I'm not lazy. -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) A toast to the kisses you've snatched and vice-versa.
msg23535/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
