Jeremy -- ...and then Jeremy Blosser said... % % I asked this in another message, but it looks like it got lost... can % someone please confirm or deny that they see this behaviour as well under % 1.3.25?
I'm running 1.3.25, so ... % % 1. use the new check-traditional-pgp command from the index on a message % that has an old-style pgp signature % 2. note that the 's' flag appears to indicate the presence of the signature % 3. view the message, with pgp_verify_sig=no % 4. note that the 's' becomes an 'S', even though no verification has taken % place ... if you'll send a traditional-style message I'll check it out and report. Note that viewing *this* message did not change the 's' to 'S' even though I have verification on and the signature was good because I have not signed my copy of your key. I expect the same behavior with the traditional method, of course. % % It also happens if you just run check-traditional-pgp from the pager. % % If other people are seeing this, I'll report it as a bug... Sounds good. :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg22660/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
