> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:04:22 -0500
> From: David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mutt Users' List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: a hook entered upon sending a message?
>
> Roman --
>
> ...and then Roman Neuhauser said...
> % Hi there,
> %
> % is there a means to let mutt perform an action on the message it sends
> % out _when_ it sends it? All the documented hooks take place long before
>
> Not AFAIK.
Any plans to implement this feature?
> % this happens... To be more specific, I'm looking for a way to delay the
> % inserting of the signature until the moment the message goes off.
> % I know my own signature, I don't need to see it every time I write an
> % email. :)
>
> If it really bothers you that much, unset $signature and $sig_dashes and
> then modify your editor command to append your signature file onto the
> temp file after the real editor completes. Note that re-editing a file
> will cause duplicate signatures, so you might also tell your editor to
> find the sig_dashes and delete from there down before jumping back to
> the beginning of the message.
Yeah, I figured out it'd be probably left for vim to do this. Then
again, (I'm no vim-hacker) there are at least three ways to quit
from vim, saving the buffer, which means I'd have to noremap all of
them... Unless I'm missing a way to avoid this. Ok, time to mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
> The code is left as an exercise for the reader ;-)
No problem. Thanks for the reply.
--
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
9:16PM up 41 days, 7:59, 16 users, load averages: 0.13, 0.31, 0.26
