* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

> Thomas --
> 
> :set mbox_type=Maildir
> T.
> ;C/tmp/TestMailFolder/

Thanks.

> Well, let's see, here...  Now I'm finally curious.  First I opened
> my big funnies folder and converted it to Maildir; on about 9400
> messages that took mutt about 7 minutes to write using the exact
> method described above (but we don't have the fastest SCSI disk even
> though we are using reiserfs.  When I open the folder both ways I get

It took about 10 seconds to convert the 4200 or so messages in cvs-all.

> [zero] [10:14am] ~>  time mutt -e "push x" -f Mail/F.funnies
> 4.460u 1.590s 1:18.68 7.6% 0+0k 0+0io 1747pf+0w
> 
> [zero] [10:16am] ~>  time mutt -e "push x" -f Mail/M.funnies
> 4.850u 3.370s 3:20.50 4.0% 0+0k 0+0io 1145pf+0w
> 
> It looks like Maildir is distinctly worse for me.

mutt -e "push q" -f Mail/lists/cvs-all
2.03s user 0.55s system 98% cpu 2.619 total

mutt -e "push q" -f Mail/TestMail
2.08s user 1.12s system 97% cpu 3.288 total

Neither felt particularly different, although Maildir felt slightly
snappier opening messages (presumably because seek()ing to a message in
a mbox is more expensive than a simple fopen()), but in both cases it
took a fraction of a second.

Size wize, the mbox was 13600K compared with a 15207K Maildir.

This is on UFS+FFS+SU, on a 384MB FreeBSD machine with dirhashing.

> It was interesting to me to find that the Maildir version does not
> show a percentage count as it counts up messages; it's comforting to
> see oneself getting closer and closer to 100% when you don't know how
> many messages are in the [large!] folder.  I'd think that would be
> even easier with Maildir, since you need only look at the directory
> inodes rather than look through the whole mbox file, but perhaps that
> percentage is of the total size rather than the total number (and the
> size, of course, is easy to get on the way in).

Would be nice to get a percentage count, even if the meaning was
slightly different to that of a mbox.

-- 
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  http://www.aagh.net/

Reply via email to