Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Philippe Lalande wrote: > > > My problem is that when I pop my messages, all the one I had > > previously read with Mutt are still marked as new. After > > investigating, it seems that Mutt does not put the 'Status:' header in > > mails of Maildir format. > > pop isn't really satisfactory if you're going to be reading mail from > more than one client IMHO. why not use imap instead? courier IMAP isn't > perfect and is a pain to compile but works pretty well for Maildir > format. Would using IMAP acheive what I am trying to do? IE. Not be informed that messages are new if I already read them using another client? Philippe
Re: Mutt, Maildir/, Status header, and Pop
plalande-mutt-users%mutt . org Wed, 19 Sep 2001 13:36:47 -0700
- Mutt, Maildir/, Status header, and Pop Philippe Lalande
- Re: Mutt, Maildir/, Status header, and... David T-G
- Re: Mutt, Maildir/, Status header, and... plalande-mutt-users%mutt . org
- Re: Mutt, Maildir/, Status header, and... David T-G
- Re: Mutt, Maildir/, Status header, and... Will Yardley
- Re: Mutt, Maildir/, Status header, and... Justin R. Miller
- Re: Mutt, Maildir/, Status header, and... plalande-mutt-users%mutt . org
- Re: Mutt, Maildir/, Status header, and... Justin R. Miller