On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:47:59AM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * Phil Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010918 09:20]:
> > I'm having some issues with mutt and PGP. PGP/MIME stuff works great, but
> > older things (like what pine puts out) does not. I'm using the procmail
> ...
> > I'm using mutt version 1.0.20 on a Debian "unstable" distribution. I'm
> > using gpg version 1.0.6. I'm sourcing an essentially stock gpg.rc (I
> > changed pgpewrap to use its fullly qualified name, but nothing else).
>
> Would you be adverse to upgrading mutt to the version in Debian
> unstable? It's using 1.3.22 at the time of this writing. In more recent
> versions (don't know when exactly in the 1.3 series this showed up) you
> can just use esc-P to tell mutt 'check-traditional-pgp' and not have to
> munge your messages via procmail.
Oops. That was quite a typo. I was actually running 1.3.20, but have
just upgraded to 1.3.22. That did not solve the problem, either. And,
when I tried Esc-P, I got the same result (application/pgp unsupported).
Suspecting misconfigureation, I checked my .muttrc and related files again
and found that I had application/pgp in my auto_view list. (I've a lot of
things in there, so I'm not surprised I missed it last time.
So that's it. In order for PGP stuff to work properly, application/pgp
must *not* be in the auto_view list.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / DNRC / UMBC-LUG: http://linux.umbc.edu
PGP public key fingerprint: 0A7D B3AD 2D10 1099 7649 AB64 04C2 05A6
--- --
<rusty> Technology and culture, and no cabal, from the trenches.
-- seen on #kuro5hin
---- --- --
