On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 18:48:21 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2001-08-27 13:39:52 -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
>
> >Is there a specific reason for this? or is there a way to override
> >this without a code edit? If not, what are the implications of
> >patching the code to allow Lines and Content-Length headers to be
> >kept/modified in an edited message?
>
> Leaving these headers in would make it considerably easier for the
> user to screw up their folders.
But why shouldn't Mutt update them?
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100%
validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des
Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc.
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
