On Fri, 18 May 2001, Joane Lispton wrote: > To sum it up, when it comes to the trade-off between > > - doing all the queueing manually, and knowing (from within mutt) that mail > has been successfully relayed > > and > > - having a MTA do the queueing for me, yet, if I wish to make sure that > something is already at the relay host, I have to dig in log files, wouldn't mailq still tell you the mail is in the queue, and hasn't been flush yet? not saying that the option not to store the fcc on failed delivery is a bad thing, just another way to check :) Dan
