On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:35:30PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:25:12PM +0200, Andre Berger typed:
>
> > Some people using worse MUAs have complained about my gpg signature.
> > KMail, for example, doesn't recognize the MIME type Mutt produces.
> > They asked for an attachment-description of the signature. Does
> > anybody know how to set things up?
>
> If you want to compensate for broken clients, clearsign your mail
> (include the sig in the body of your mail) instead of using s/mime.
A client is not broken if it doesn't implement s/mime. It seems
reasonable to use a description for the signature attachment so it
doesn't show up as a random unnamed attachment in such mailers.
