On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:24:14AM +0100, Dave Pearson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:12:41AM +0100, Dave Pearson wrote: > > > If that's what you're after perhaps you could run mutt inside an xterm (M-x > > term RET) [SNIP] > > That should have ream "eterm", not "xterm". read what difference does that make? -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- Mutt and xEmacs TeLeNiEkO
- Re: Mutt and xEmacs Sam Roberts
- Re: Mutt and xEmacs TeLeNiEkO
- Re: Mutt and xEmacs Dave Pearson
- Re: Mutt and xEmacs Dave Pearson
- Re: Mutt and xEmacs Thomas Dickey
- Re: Mutt and xEmacs Dave Pearson
- Re: Mutt and xEmacs Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Mutt and xEmacs Ailbhe Leamy
- Re: Mutt and xEmacs Dave Pearson
- Re: Mutt and xEmacs Jim Lambert