To test a problem, I made a .muttrc with only these two lines from my
usual configuration:
send-hook . 'set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; set realname="Daniel J Peng"'
send-hook '~C @gecko.serc\.rmit\.edu\.au' 'set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ; set
realname="Razl"'
This should, when I reply to mail form a mailing list at
gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au , set the From: header to
Razl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, right?
When I reply to the attached message, though, Mutt sets the From: header
to Razl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
The odd thing is, if I cancel that message and try it again, Mutt works
as I want it to and sets the From: header to
Razl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .
Is this a bug? Or am I just missing something about send-hooks?
--
Daniel J. Peng
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Who is John Galt? X Against Outlook & HTML Mail
/ \ http://www.thebackrow.net/
A-Z affectionately,
1 to 10 alphabetically,
from here to eternity without in betweens,
still looking for a custom fit in an off-the-rack world,
sales talk from sales assistants
when all i want to do is lower your resistance,
no rhythm in cymbals no tempo in drums,
love's on arrival,
she comes when she comes,
right on the target but wide of the mark...
send-hook . 'set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; set realname="Daniel J Peng"'
send-hook '~C @gecko.serc\.rmit\.edu\.au' 'set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ; set
realname="Razl"'
> If this is truly the case, then I question whether this CFJ should not
> be dismissed on the grounds that "[i]ts Statement does not relate to a
> matter relevant to the Rules," Rule 1565.
But it IS relevant, insomuch as this CFJ might define a particular limit
to what Rules can do. Even if this would have no immediate effect (it's
not much use to CFJ <RULES> to control what <RULES> cannot control) it
could set a precedent that would help guide future proposals with respect
to Player actions.
-Goethe.
