I'd strongly suggest that, before you continue to struggle with
gnupg, update to _at_ _least_ mutt-1.2.5i, which has a totally
different - and more flexible - configuration interface for
pgp/gnupg.
On 2001-02-14 09:51:37 +0100, Andreas Grytz wrote:
> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:51:37 +0100
> From: Andreas Grytz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mutt Users' List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: pgp output
> Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users' List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
> Organization: Linux New Media AG
>
> Hi.
>
> I continue suffering with the de-/encryption.
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 12:44:36PM -0800, David T-G wrote:
> > Andreas --
> >
> > %
> > ...
> > % BD8B050Dgpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
> > % Alright, I know that it has something to do with the key, given
> > % with the mail. I assume that I have to put it in a certain file.
> >
> > If the key came with the email then you should be able to simply extract
> > it and let mutt handle storing it for you.
> >
> >
> > % Can someone give me a hint where to start?
> >
> > Hit '?' and look at the key bindings.
> >
> >
>
> I did and find ^K which works, but produces the following output:
> Warning: Long option `language' is not translated/used.
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Total number processed: 0
> WARNING: Can't find the right public key-- can't check signature
> integrity.
>
> I tried to find out, what the long option `language` means but
> neither manpage nor help of gpg does anything say about it.
>
> So it got back to homepage of mutt an studied Using mutt with
> pgp/gpg. But I didn't find something which helps me.
>
> I think I basically missed something important. Mayby the
> configuration of gnupg is wrong? Or do I have to tell mutt which
> program I use for en-/decryption?
>
> Lost in user space,
>
> Andreas
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Andreas Grytz | http://www.linux-user.de
> Stefan-George-Ring 24 | Tel: +49 (0) 89 993411-0
> D-81929 München | Fax: +49 (0) 89 993411-99
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
