Hello!
I have a slight problem with address rewriting.
If you look at the two attached messages you will se that the address in the
version that is actually received is FUBAR (the other is from the "sent-mail"
folder).
Someone suggested that tis was an error in the mail systems address rewriting
function, but my BOFH denies that.
Is there a way to fix this?
Regards, Lars
--
Lars M. Johansson +44 (0)7880 633134
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Every nonzero finite dimensional product space has an orthonormal base
-- it makes sense when you don't think about it"
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:43:41 +0100
From: Lars M Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: adresstest
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Status: RO
Content-Length: 192
Lines: 8
?
--
Lars M. Johansson +44 (0)7880 633134
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Every nonzero finite dimensional product space has an orthonormal base
-- it makes sense when you don't think about it"
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 18 15:44:08 2000
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from romeo.ic.ac.uk (romeo.ic.ac.uk [155.198.5.9])
by kobra.efd.lth.se (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e9IDi7L23587
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:44:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mandy.ee.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.114.13])
by romeo.ic.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
id 13ltVO-0003MF-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:43:42 +0100
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:43:41 +0100
From: "Lars M Johansson <Lars M Johansson"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: adresstest
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Status: RO
Content-Length: 192
Lines: 8
?
--
Lars M. Johansson +44 (0)7880 633134
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Every nonzero finite dimensional product space has an orthonormal base
-- it makes sense when you don't think about it"
