Ben --

The short answer is that, as you state, mutt is extremely correct.  You
are not wrong in your understanding, and so you can see that the only
other possibility is that other mailers are wrong in their
implementation.  Gee, go figure :-)

In order to communicate with such Outhouse losers, you might find it
handy to set $pgp_create_traditional via a send-hook; instead of creating
a MIME-attached signature of the MIME-attached body, mutt will have pgp
sign the body in armored form and use the whole thing as the text body,
which LookOut! and other broken can then understand.


:-D
-- 
David T-G                       * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED]      * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/        Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001.  There was no year 0.
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*

PGP signature

Reply via email to