On 2000.08.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, while that might be convenient, I can also see how that would cause
> problems. If you specifically set the fcc and then mutt notices that it
Yep.
> Probably :-) My bet is that it would only be a benevolent feature patch,
> though.
Seems like the most adaptable approach, if this were to be implemented,
is to have an update-fcc routine that rewrites fcc: according to to:
and $force_name/$save_name. I think that automating it would be
problematic for a variety of reasons.
--
-D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] NSIT University of Chicago
