date_format DOES affect %d in the index, IFF you're actually using
%d. Probably you're using %{} instead. Please check you actual
index_format closely. Note the default index_format does not use %d.

On Monday, 21 August 2000 at 08:58, Dave Pearson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 09:16:03AM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 09:42:15 +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
> > > According to section 6.3.27 of the mutt manual (I'm running 1.2.5i here) the
> > > variable `date_format' "controls the format of the date printed by the
> > > ``%d'' sequence in ``index_format''".
> > > 
> > > Further, section 6.3.73 says that the %d and %D sequences display the date
> > > and time of a message "in the format specified by ``date_format''".
> > > 
> > > However, it would appear that `date_format' doesn't (quite rightly?) work
> > > for all uses of the `index_format' sequences.
> > 
> > Would it? Not to me.
> 
> To quote section 6.3.27:
> 
> ,----
> |   6.3.27.  date_format
> | 
> |   Type: string
> |   Default: "!%a, %b %d, %Y at %I:%M:%S%p %Z"
> | 
> |   This variable controls the format of the date printed by the ``%d''
> |   sequence in ``index_format''.
> `----
> 
> if it doesn't say that it will affect `index_format' what does it mean when
> it says that it controls the format of the date printed by "%d" when used in
> `index_format'? In the tests I've done here it doesn't do that. Using %d and
> changing `date_format' has no affect on the display of an index.
> 
> To quote section 6.3.73:
> 
> ,----
> |   %d      date and time of the message in the format
> |           specified by ``date_format'' converted to
> |           sender's time zone
> |   %D      date and time of the message in the format
> |           specified by ``date_format'' converted to
> |           the local time zone
> `----
> 
> This, again, suggests that the index display of dates can be controlled by
> the variable `date_format'.
> 
> > > Is this a documentation bug?
> > 
> > I don't see any bug here.
> 
> The bug I'm thinking of is the one above, where it says that it affects
> `index_format' when it doesn't appear to do so.
> 

-- 
Don't make Godzilla mad!

PGP signature

Reply via email to