Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???")

[Mrinal Kalakrishnan]

Hi,

David Champion typed:
> > The advantage with LinuxDoc/DocBook DTDs is that you can convert it to
> > any format you like later. So you can have an online HTML version,
> > plain text, PS, PDF, etc.. (like the mutt docs)
> The disadvantage, last time I checked, is that it's still tedious to
> get them processed on Unix.  Maybe that's not necessary, but I always
> argue with any decision that (in practice) drives data or a process out
> of the realm of portability.

That's just like the situation of mutt development now, IIRC.
Developers have to use GNU tools, but users can compile with any
`make' they want. So here, developers use sgmltools, and the distro
will be in html / whatever.

-- 
Mrinal Kalakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mrinal.dhs.org/
Linux 2.2.16 || PGP:B1E86F5B || Mutt 1.3.4i (2000-06-19) || VIM 5.6 
-- 
We are Pentium of Borg. Division is futile. You will be approximated.
(seen in someone's .signature)