On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 11:34:45AM -0600, Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
> sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
> with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
> different outputs. The first is from the manual install and the
> second is from the RPM install
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1262377 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt*
> -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 36607 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6668 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/muttbug*
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 418000 Jun 21 11:24 /usr/bin/mutt*
> -rwxr-sr-x 1 root root 7588 Jun 21 11:24 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6668 Jun 21 11:23 /usr/bin/muttbug*
>
> Anyone know why there's such a discrepancy? I think the RPM might be
> stripping the binaries but I don't know if that would make such a big
> difference... Doing a mutt -v on both the RPM and manual binaries
> produces the same output:
Is it possible that the first group is statically linked, and the second is
dynamically linked?
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
